Tag Archives: Proposal

Boulder News: Arapahoe Ridge ‘Rock’ Park Renovation

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A renovation effort put forth by the Parks and Recreation Department began on May 1st of this year ‘Rock’ Park in Arapahoe Ridge.  The aim of this renovation is to improve the park as a whole by installing new infrastructure and upgrading playground equipment to meet current standards.  The project has just begun, but is scheduled to be completed by the fall of this year.

The first step in this renovation project is the removal and pruning of trees in the park and by public streets.  By removing any potential obstructions beforehand, the installation of new infrastructure is expected to go much smoother.  This also keeps the park from being closed at a later date, and is most cost effective.

Along with pruning for tree health, one notable tree in Arapahoe Ridge will be removed.  An Ash tree has become infested with Emerald Ash Borer, and will be removed to keep the infestation from spreading.

The park itself is not going to be closed off to the public during the renovation period, however.  The city has stated that they will make an effort to keep their impact low, although the public should be aware that some amenities may not be available during certain periods of the renovation.

The local community was integral in the planning phase of this renovation, with feedback on the rock structure itself being very strong.  With that in mind, the Parks Department moved forward with a plan that would have the least impact on the structure as possible.  The plan states that they will install a support to ensure the main cave area remain structurally sound over time, install a rubber surface to replace the pea gravel, and secure the boulders on the main structure through re-grouting.

Once complete, ‘Rock’ Park will be home to a brand new playground meant to highlight the rock structure the park is known for.  The Parks Department is also planning on hosting a celebration event for the completion of the project when that time arrives.  Further updates on the project can be found on the Arapahoe Ridge Park page on the city’s website.

Denver News: Clear Creek Crossing Development

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , , ,

Ever since 2011, there has been an 80-acre site in Wheat Ridge that has gone unused.  It was originally to be the home of a 185,000 square foot Cabela’s store and showroom, but the retailer backed out of their decision to go forward building on that space.  For five years the land went unused until it was picked up by a Phoenix based real estate group called Evergreen Devco who are very excited about contributing to the area.

“It’s very well-located real estate being at the intersection of the two highways, and we love the visibility and access.  It’s an important piece of property for the city, and we want it to be sustainable for the community long-term,” said Evergreen’s Tyler Carlson.

Evergreen held a community meeting at the end of 2016 where they announced their tentative plans for the space, which was to be used for residential units, an office complex, and a Super Walmart.  Since then, Evergreen and the city have shared that Walmart may no longer be part of the plan.

Wheatridge’s city manager Goff said that “the biggest (change) is that Walmart is uncertain about whether they will be apart of the development now.  It’s just part of the current retail market.  The internet is taking over. Amazon is taking over.”  With that in mind, the city is looking for alternatives in case Walmart doesn’t come through.

Another change is in the amount of space intended for office and housing space.  Originally, 10 acres were to be used for housing and 30 for offices.  However, the revised plan now has 15 acres for housing and 25 for an office complex owned by a Denver area employer.

Construction is set to begin in the fall of this year, starting with “hook ramps” being built onto I-70, with buildings going up in 2018.  All that’s left is for the new plan to be approved by City Council and the city’s planning commission.

“It’s really not changing all that much from what we thought it was going to look like,” Goff said. “We’re excited it’s getting much closer to the finish line than it has been in a long time.”

Boulder News: Boulder Plot Approved for Development

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

During the last 20 years there have been four separate proposals for development at the 20 acre space at McKenzie Junction.  This plot, surrounded by highway, first had an office and hotel project in 1998, a five building office park in 2000, and two separate multi-use plans in 2006 and 2015.  None were approved due to concerns about noise and the dangers of people settling in a space cut off by highways on all sides.

In April, a plan was approved by the Boulder Planning Board.  The same team who made the most recent proposal in 2015 came back with a new multi-use plan.

Called Diagonal Crossing, this plan will consist of 357 housing units, a quarter of which will be affordable housing, with 20 units given to faculty of Naropa University.  Additionally, three local nonprofits, Meals on Wheels, Studio Arts Boulder and Bridge House’s Ready to Work, have dedicated space allocated to them.

While the Planning Board has given its blessing, the city council must now approve to proceed.  During the next few weeks the council will have the opportunity to examine the proposal, ask questions, and possibly reject the project because previous concerns including, traffic, noise, are still factors.

The Planning Board raised these concerns when reviewing the project as well, but eagerness to develop the site seems to have increased over the last two decades.  “While this is not a perfect site, it’s not the worst site either,” Chairman John Putnam said.  He added that the access to trails, open space, and access to east Boulder and the Diagonal Highway could be very enticing.

Approximately 10 neighboring areas of the site came to the board with concerns and complaints about the development including Allison Management, Trammell Crow Residential, and Coburn Partners.  “It just doesn’t seem like a nice entrance into our Boulder town,” Gary Carmichael stated. “There’s just too much density on this, and it needs to be lightened up.”

One board member, David Ensign, also shared concerns about the project being the first thing people see coming into Boulder.  “We can talk a lot about the positive aspects of this, but I also know that as you’re driving in on the Diagonal, you’re going to see this very isolated pool of housing surrounded by these highways.  It doesn’t seem like something that is a gateway to me.”

“We have horses, cattle, dogs, kids,” Erin Harding said. “To hear that it’s going to be an active area 24/7 is very disconcerting to us, because that’s not our lifestyle out there. … The density is everyone’s huge concern.”  Many also noted that McKenzie Junction already suffers from traffic problems that this development would only exacerbate.

When the plan was proposed in 2015, many of the council members made it clear that the location rather than the plan was what made them believe the project wouldn’t work.  What might give this plan more of a chance than it had two years ago, according to board members, is the decrease in available housing.

Boulder News: Boulder Country Awards $126k in Local Grants

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , ,

Boulder County has given a sum total of $126k for the cities and towns  for new projects.  Specifically, projects and services aimed toward environmental sustainability.  There are a great number of sustainability projects that can be pursued thanks to these grants.  For example, Longmont intends to develop new ways of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.  And, Nederland plans to build a greenhouse to increase food production.

The sustainability coordinator for Boulder, Susie Strife, commented on the grants.  “We are grateful for the leadership of municipalities to advance sustainability in our region.  We value the partnerships we have built to meet our shared vision of more sustainable communities.”

In addition to the grant money, municipalities will also match at least 25% of the funds awarded.  However, Jamestown, Nederland, and Ward will provide local services equivalent to that amount in place of raw funds.

The city of Boulder’s grant of $15,000 will be used to create a strategy for increasing electric vehicle adoption rates.  The overall goal is to reach a level that meets the city’s climate commitment target.  Lafayette has a similar goal with their $15,000 involving solar power.  They intend to make the process of planning and permitting panels much easier.  Additionally, solar workshops and resources for the community will be made available.

Louisville, also receiving $15,000, will hire a sustainability consultant.  They will carry out the city’s short and long term objectives in their Sustainability Action Plan.  Superior will use their $15,000 to improve their waste drop off site.  This will increase waste diversion from the landfill, while also making the facility more user friendly and safer.  Superior’s goal is to reach 50% waste diversion with this grant.

Jamestown, receiving the smallest grant of $6,785, also looks to use the funds for waste diversion.  Their approach will be through community education on zero waste and recycling collection.  Ward intends to continue efforts in food security.  Also, they will be able to hire a consultant to look into septic system solutions.

All projects were reviewed and approved by the County.  They were detailed in full in the country news release.

 

Denver news: Rooney Valley Development Plans

News and Insights, , , , , , , , ,

2017-03_CONews

Development plans for Rooney Valley were approved by Lakewood City Council and the Morrison Town Board early in February.  The approval set the plans for one of the last large open sections of land running along C-470.  While no public disapproval was expressed in Morrison, Lakewood residents brought up concerns to the council.

Many Lakewood residents were concerned about what impact the development would have on the environment.  Also, view sheds were a point of concern for many.  While amendments were made to address these concerns, councilmen Charley Able still opposed it.  “Different doesn’t necessarily mean better,” Mr. Able said.  “Because this is not as bad as the previous plan is not a reason to vote for it.”

The updates to the plan that were amended included preserving views.  The minimum space allotted for wildlife was expanded from Dakota Hogback to Pikes Peak, as well as a limitation on how many dwellings per acre could be built.  But, according to Morrison’s town planner Carrie McCool, that wasn’t the largest change.  That was what is being called the neighborhood node.

“It basically sets forth at key intersections and areas of the valley that are for more mixed  uses  located within walking distance from maybe lower-density residential areas  including  ground floor commercial with maybe residential on top,” McCool said.

The plan, known as Plan Rooney Valley, outlines the standards for commercial and residential development.  However, this doesn’t just apply to the two counties.  Developers will also have to conform to these standards in order for their plans to be approved.  This is one reason why councilwoman Dana Gutwein voted to approve the plan.  “The sign that you drive in and see is ‘Building an inclusive community,’ and I believe this plan is not a less-bad plan or whatever, I think it’s a good plan.”  Morrison’s mayor Sean Forey shared a similar position.  He found the new plan to be a replacement of “a very bad plan.”

Morrison’s position has been focused on commercial development in their section of the valley.  So, with the amendments and updates, town board member Brewster Caesar began to feel their position was starting to shift.  “If it’s going to be developed I would like to see Lakewood be the one to get the homes, I want the residences in Lakewood,” Caesar said.

A full draft of Plan Rooney Valley can be viewed by anyone looking for more details on Lakewood’s official website.

 

Open Space Debate Continues

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2017-02_BoNews

The opportunity presented by the 20 acres of vacant government land is a subject of great debate.  The issue was shelved in October to reconsider proposals.  On one hand, there are those who wish for the space to be used for new affordable housing.  While on the other, many also want it to remain an open space.  But, before any decision can be made, a plan must go through four separate government bodies.   They are the county Planning Commission, the Board of County Commissioners, the Boulder Planning Board and the Boulder City Council.

The head of Boulder County Housing and Human Services, Frank Alexander, “see[s] this as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”  When speaking to the Boulder County Planning Commission members, he stated: “We are truly in an affordable housing crisis.”  Alexander and a member of the BVSD are the main forces behind turning the land into affordable housing.

However, on the other side of the issue is Dave Rechberger.  Rechberger’s organization is arguing to keep the 20 acres of land as open space.  He believes that the property should be viewed as two 10 acre spaces, and treated separately.  His group has legal objections to the plans put forth.  One of which claims the school system would violate state law by using the space for a school or public use.  Rechberger’s Twin Lakes Action Group is “ready, willing and able to fight this in a court of law.”

After a four and a half hour long meeting on January 18th, a vote was taken.   Over 75 people were registered to come in and speak about the issue, with 62 appearing.   These citizens are concerned members of the community taking the opportunity to speak up.  Both sides of the issue were given voice for the commissioners to hear before voting.  In a 4-3 split, with two members of the Planning Commission absent, the land was designated for medium density housing.

It won’t be until February 15th that the Commission votes on possible changes to the current plan.    Unlike January’s meeting, all 9 commissioners will be present. .   Whatever plan is agreed upon in February will then be taken to the county commissioners.  From there, the issue will presented to a public hearing held by the Boulder Planning Board and Boulder City Council.  Only after going through all four government bodies will any plan for this land be accepted.

 

Boulder News: Envisioning East Arapahoe

News and Insights, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

conference-room

Envisioning East Arapahoe has found its way back to the city’s agenda after being shelved for two years.  Three main scenarios were created considering different goals and predictions of how the neighborhood will look in the future.

Scenario A is termed “Current Trends.”  This scenario assumes East Arapahoe will continue having small industry, with few opportunities for new office or retail space.  Additional residential buildings would be less likely to be built.  In short, scenario A plans for the least change to our neighborhood.

Scenario B is termed “Districts.”  Walnut East would extend to meet 48th St north Boulder Community Hospital with more medical related offices and possibly retail.  The area below Gerald Stazio ballfields would become “Recycling Row”.  Significant street alterations on Arapahoe including new intersections are planned to increase commuter throughput.  The Arapahoe alterations aim to facilitate transportation modalities.

Scenario C is termed “Housing Choices.”  Affordable housing is planned for between 55th & 63rd on Arapahoe.  New housing would be built within a 15 minute walk from nearby shops and places of work.  The BDT and surrounding grounds would become part of an “Art Center.”  This plan includes the highest level of street alterations.  New parks, community gardens, and public spaces are all planned for scenarios B & C.

The Transportation Plan is another aspect of the Envision East Arapahoe plan. This long term plan aims to increase all types of transportation on Arapahoe.  The plan supports the Boulder’s Transportation Master Plan and the increasing number of commuters from Boulder’s supporting communities.

These plans are likely the most impactful Boulder City intervention in our neighborhood in a long time.  Public meetings for these plans have not been set for the Envinsion East Arapahoe, so stay tuned.   The city has yet to confirm any details on Envision East Arapahoe plan, but there is a public meeting for the Transportation Plan on February 2, 2017.  The previous meeting was on December 5th.  Those who want to have their voices heard on these matters can contact Adam at adam@krollre.com to receive more details as they are available.

 

Sakura Square Redevelopment Proposed

News and Insights, , , , , , ,

blueprints

Sakura Square in Denver Colorado has been home to many Japanese-American families and businesses for decades, and is now seeking a proposal to redevelop much of its downtown block to better serve and represent future generations.  This redevelopment would be done around some existing landmarks such as museums, martial arts studios, Japanese restaurants, and gardens.  The Tri-State Buddhist Temple would also remain where it is, but could potentially be getting a new building.  A special effort is being made to preserve well established businesses and locations, such as the Pacific Mercantile, which has been family owned and operated for over 70 years.  The owners of Sakura Square’s proposal specifically call for a “redevelopment outcome that reflects their sensitivity to sustainable and superior modern Japanese-influenced design and architecture. Quality over quantity is a focus.  When complete, the block should be a simple but iconic expression of Japanese community and culture and have a gracious presence in relationship to the street, neighborhood and community.”

The areas that would be renovated could give Sakura Square, and Denver as a whole, new office spaces, residential areas, and retail space.  This proposal comes from a night and day transformation of what Sakura Square was when first established.  As Sakura Square CEO Gary Yamashita said “When members of the temple first purchased the block 45 years ago, this area of Denver was literally Skid Row. It was bars and brothels.  We’ve had such good fortune that it’s probably some of the hottest real estate in Denver, right next to LoDo, right next to the ballpark, right next to the redevelopment in Arapahoe Square.”

The desire to keep the Square’s location in downtown Denver is more than just a monetary one, however.  Many families and businesses feel tied to that location, and have spoken out about selling the block and relocating the temple when considered in the past.  Sakura Square is the remnants of a much larger Japanese-American neighborhood that began close to 1900 when many Japanese came to Colorado as farmers.

“2016 is the 100th anniversary of the Denver Buddhist Temple. It hasn’t been at Sakura Square for all 100 years, but this is its 100th year,” Yamashita said. “We’re now looking at re-positioning ourselves for the next 100 years — Sakura Square and the temple. It’s looking into the future.”

The owners of Sakura Square have already put forth their request for developers to submit proposals for the redevelopment with a deadline set for October 19th.  From that point they will decide which proposals to pursue further and discuss more in depth plans.  Whatever the outcome, this will mark a big change in the heart of downtown Denver Colorado.